Dan Martin vs Drew Van Orderlain Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W W W W W L
Form
L W L L L W L W W LHead-To-Head: Martin 2 - 0 Orderlain
They have played 4 sets in total, with Martin winning 4 and Orderlain winning 0. The last match between Martin and Orderlain was at the M15 Rochester, 16-07-2024, First, Clay with Dan Martin getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dan Martin | 2 |
| Drew Van Orderlain | 0 |
M15 Rochester(16-07-2024)
6
4
6
3
| Martin | Stats | Orderlain |
|---|---|---|
| 59% (16-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 35% (6-11) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 583 | Ranking | N/A |
| 583 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 25 | Age | 30 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 52% (87-81) | Career Total W/L | 41% (115-167) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Borges VS Fokina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS O'Connell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Dan Martin
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve %
81%
(
43 of
53)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 14 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:38:30 | Average Match Time | 1:38:30 |
| 71% (72/101) | 1st Serve % | 72% (93/129) |
| 69% (50/72) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (48/93) |
| 55% (16/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (15/36) |
| 39% (9/23) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 80% (4/5) |
| 51% (66/129) | Return Points Win % | 35% (35/101) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Dan Martin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Dan Martin
47%
(
27 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
77%
(
24 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Mateus Alves
54%
(
61 of
112)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
102)
7
Aces
8
8
Double Faults
4
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
39%
(
20 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
41%
(
46 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
109
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(1) 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Tom Paris
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
74)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Felix Corwin
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
49%
(
38 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
78
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Benjamin Thomas George
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
9
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(12) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Dan Martin
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
17
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
9%
(
1 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
8
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
94%
(
31 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Pinnington Jones
Player
Dan Martin
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
74
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Player
Dan Martin
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
1-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Drew Van Orderlain Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Dickerson
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 4-6 14-12 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Robin Catry
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
111)
14
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
48 of
70)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
24 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
40 of
111)
106
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charlie Robertson
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
43%
(
20 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
54
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Drew Van Orderlain
Player
Taha Baadi
79%
(
56 of
71)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
19 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (87/81) | Win/Loss | 41% (115/167) |
| 52% (193/179) | Sets Win/Loss | 42% (263/360) |
| 52% (1791/1659) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (2690/2935) |
| 52% (46/42) | Hard Win/Loss | 41% (41/60) |
| 58% (28/20) | Clay Win/Loss | 39% (46/73) |
| 41% (13/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (28/34) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 316 | Aces Total | 142 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
| 316 | Total Double Faults | 196 |
| 1:22:8 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 368.78 | Average Opponent Rank | 210.04 |
| 61% (5169/8446) | 1st Serve % | 65% (3314/5103) |
| 66% (3436/5169) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (1973/3314) |
| 49% (1616/3277) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (846/1789) |
| 41% (332/802) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (220/485) |
| 39% (3161/8168) | Return Points Win % | 40% (1964/4904) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (13/16) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 54% (74/64) | Futures W/L | 41% (115/163) |
| 52% (85/164) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 41% (114/280) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 46% (19/41) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (16/42) |
| 47% (18/38) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (26/59) |
| 85% (93/79) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (115/102) |
| 15% (93/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (115/13) |
| 11% (75/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (167/13) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
